It's my money and I need it now!

While I appreciate Hughes Federal Credit Union keeping my information safe and secure; this bullshit of having to send a text every time I try to login online is getting old.  Especially since they send it to my husband, rather than to me.  Even using *my* login credentials, the one that I created, they still send the verification to my husband’s cell phone.  Which is not particularly convenient when my husband is not home, but even when he is home it’s annoying.  But in addition to being inconvenient and annoying, it’s also misogynistic as all get out.  Really, Hughes?  I need my husband’s authorization to access *my* account?  Like I’m a child?  My husband is a pretty great sport in he just immediately forwards the text to me but what if my husband was not available?  Or worse, an asshole?  What if he controlled every aspect of my life and, thanks to your practices, has your help in controlling my money?  

Let me give you a scenario:    I want to go to the grocery store so I go online to see how much money I have in my account.  I try to login and the credit union sends my husband the verification code needed (EVERY DAMN TIME) in order to access my account (even though I am using the same computer each time and the correct password).  In my real-life scenario, KC would simply send the information on.  But let’s say I’m Beaten Betty, this simple act of inquiring about how much money I have now becomes a major ordeal.  Do I face the husband’s wrath and have the information sent to him or do I make the drive to the credit union first, unload the kids, wait in line to get my balance and then go to the store?  Anyone who has had to wait in line with kids knows it’s an enormous pain; and now I’m having to do it twice (the credit union and then the store).  Meanwhile, my husband can do the same simple act in a matter of minutes.

Not cool, Hughes.  Not cool.

"I wanna tell her that I love her, but the point is probably moot."

I'm very fortunate to have friends of different ages.  They each make my life richer and diverse and for that I am so grateful.  But there's something to be said for friends of your generation.

Rick Springfield is coming to Fox Theatre for an "intimate concert," which just translates to that's the biggest venue he can fill anymore.  I don't care, his was the very first concert I went to (I think I was ten) and I've seen him several more times throughout the years and I'm going again - and I'm dragging KC with me.  I start to think of what friends of ours might be interested in going with us and I start imaging how different phone calls with different friends might go.

Our much younger friends:

"Hey!  Rick Springfield is going to be in concert on April 9th; do you guys want to go with us!?"

"Rick Springfield.  You know, Jessie's Girl.  I've Done Everything For You.  Dr. Noah Drake...."

"Yeah, he's probably on Spotify.  Seriously, you've never even heard Jessie's Girl?!?  Didn't you ever watch General Hospital when you were younger?"

"I don't know, like 1982."

"The year you were born?  I see."

"Well yes, $90 is a lot of money for someone you've never heard of."

Our much older friends:

"Hey!  Do you remember Rick Springfield?"

"Well yes, I liked his music.  That's why I was calling - to see if you wanted to go to see him in concert."

"You're right.  Very different from Led Zepplin."

"Well, he kind of looks like Eric Clapton...."

"Yes, $90 is a lot of money to pay, even when you like the music, so I understand."

My generational friends:

"Hey!  Rick Springfield is going to be in concert on-"

"Yes, really!  April-"

"I know.  I had such a huge crush too.  Remember rushing to my house after school so we could watch General Hospital?"

"I know, Dr. Noah Drake!"

"Remember when we were in high school and he did that concert at the farm over off of 5-Mile Road?"

"Yes, Corey Hart was his opening act!  I forgot about that!"

"Anyway, April 9th.  I think he's aged really well."

"Only $90!"

"It's a date!  I can't wait!!"

And that's why generational friends are awesome.

Fruit salads.

I don't mean to brag, but I'm married to a pretty great guy.  As I was reflecting on that fact earlier today, I realized I need to add the caveat, 'for me.'  I'm married to a pretty great guy for me.  I don't mean like I'm a 6 and my spouse is an 8 so I married 'up', I mean he and I are a really good match. I can think of a few people that would be absolutely miserable hitched to him.  For starters, he's pretty dang anti-social; unless he's gotten to know you, then he's the life of the party.  The trick is letting you actually get to know him.  I have plenty of social butterfly friends for which that would be a deal breaker.  Secondly, he's ridiculously tall.  This makes dancing, skiing, and skating a thing of the past for me.  I can only dance a song or two with him before my neck starts hurting because I have to tilt my head way back in order to look at him when we're that close.  He has pretty much refused to ski or skate because, as he puts it, he "looks like Lurch" on skates or in ski boots.  Another possible deal breaker for someone.  So, he's not without his shortcomings.  I say this preemptively for the story I'm about to tell.

My daughter announced the other night at dinner that she wants to marry a man just like her dad, but that it probably won't happen because her dad is perfect and there's no men in her generation that could measure up to how great he is.  She continued on about how lucky I am to have a husband like him.  I agreed (because I do agree) but then I asked her why I should be considered 'lucky'?  Didn't I  deserve that?  She gave me the guilt-ridden, obligatory, "you're a great catch too, mom"  but then continued to gush about her dad.  He cooks, he's handy around the house, he's got a good job so he can take care of his family, he's handsome, he's funny, he loves his wife and kids, he likes animals, he's a good athlete.... this girl had a list!  I realized that she sees KC through my rose-colored glasses and that worried me.  It's taken 20+ years to get my rose-colored tint just right.  This shit didn't just happen.  It's taken a lot of work and commitment on both our parts.  Behind-the-scenes arguments over the years that our kids never saw.  Compromises that were made after they went to bed.  Frustrations, tears, anger - these are the things that we went through but that made our relationship stronger.  She didn't see that - she just saw her parents got along all the time with, what seemed, little effort.  On one hand, I'm glad that my kids were raised in a home that they felt safe and knew their parents loved each other and them; on the other hand, I'm worried we made it look too easy and have set them, especially my list-making daughter, up for failure because they didn't see the effort that it sometimes took (and at times, still takes!)  I love that KC is the yardstick for which Dear Daughter will measure her future suitors.  The problem is she is using her dad today, not her dad 20 years ago, and that is really an apples to oranges comparison.  Her dad was great and all 20 years ago but he was far from the perfect designation we would give him today.  (I know what you're thinking and trust me, I realize and publicly acknowledge that I've also come a long way over the years.)  There's no way any boy can live up to the KC that would be considered today's oranges but he might be able to measure up to the younger, apple version KC.  The problem is how do we get Dear Daughter to believe apples turn into oranges without her settling for a lemon.

I think the bug guy saw me naked.

Since being diagnosed with MS, I am very routine-oriented.  The body memory of how I do things every day keeps me on track when my cognitive memory fails me.  So when KC is home, he throws my routine in a big ol' tailspin and I get very discombobulated.  Which annoys me.

My husband is an early riser and he enjoys the morning from the minute he gets out of bed.

I am much slower to embrace the beauty of the day.

When he gets up, one of the first things KC does is goes around the house and opens all the blinds.  Because we live where it's sunny 350 days a year, that means our house is flooded with daylight and sunshine.  I do open the blinds, eventually, it's just much farther down my list of things to do.  I prefer to gradually let the sunshine in as I become more acclimated to having my eyes open - not have them blasted all at once.

So, the fact that I don't open the blinds until after I've been awake and moving a while is part of my routine.  We have a room separate from our bedroom where we get ready; my closet and the bathroom is part of this room.  Having this setup was especially nice for my husband when he worked midnights; he would not be bothered while he was trying to sleep and now that I don't have to wake up with an alarm, it's particularly lovely for me when KC is getting ready.  This room is one of the rooms that KC opens the blinds for when he's home and messing with how things get done every day.  When I get out of the shower, I walk back and forth from my closet to the bathroom while I'm getting ready.  This part of the routine involves me being naked or partially naked because I get dressed in stages.  It's a very long explanation why and probably only makes sense to me.  And since I'm usually home alone with the blinds closed, it really doesn't matter.

One Friday, not too long ago, KC was home and up-and-at-'em long long before I was.  I got up and went straight to the shower before even talking to anyone.  (It's just better that way for all involved.)  I fell into my routine and started getting ready.  Back and forth from the bathroom to the closet.  Pretty soon I hear the doorbell ring and the dogs go nuts.  We were expecting the satellite TV repairman, but not until the afternoon; why was he here three hours early?  I hear KC go outside and talk to someone so I quickly get dressed and go to put the dogs outside so the man can work in peace without having his butt sniffed every time he bends over.  (I really have tried to teach them manners, but at the end of the day, they're still dogs.)  As I'm walking down the hall, KC comes back in.

I ask, "Why is the Dish guy here so early?"
Kasey replies, "Oh, that wasn't him, that was the exterminator.  He just wanted to tell us he was here."
"He never does that.  That's weird."

That's the truth.  We have had the same monthly pest service company for almost 12 years and, unless he is spraying inside, which he hardly ever does, I can't remember a single time he rang the bell to just let me know he's here.

Then I hear him driving off.
 "Wow, that was fast," Kasey says. 

I go back to my bathroom and finish getting ready.  But now I'm annoyed.  Why would the bug guy let us know he was here?  Just because he saw KC's car in the driveway, he decided to let us know he's here?  Oh sure, he's going to be all professional with a man, but not with a woman.  Such b.s.

I chide myself a little... I try to give him the benefit of the doubt,  He knows KC's a cop, maybe he was worried about getting shot.  Or maybe he wanted us to keep the dogs in the house when he's in the backyard.  No, the dogs never bother him.

The more I think about it, the weirder it gets.  He is always here a good 20 minutes, at least.  Today he was here five.  He wouldn't have even had to time to spray the backya... then it hits me.  He had already sprayed the backyard when he rang the doorbell.  While I was walking back and forth -naked- from the closet to the bathroom.

I come out to the kitchen and dramatically announce, "I think the bug guy saw me naked."
KC chuckles, "Why would you say that?"
"Because you're home and you screw up my routine.  Thanks a lot." and I storm back to my bathroom.

Poor KC.

I am a police officer's wife.

Thank you to every police officer out there risking his/her life, every day.

My husband has been spit at, shot at, punched, and kicked. He's been in more wrestling matches and foot pursuits than I can count. More than once, criminals have tried to run him over with a vehicle. People scream obscenities at him as they drive down the street. On their way to jail, bad guys threaten his family. He's been first on scene when children have been killed, when moms have been murdered in front of their children, sons have committed suicide, and dads have been shot. He's saved children who were being held hostage, and gingerly taken women who were beaten and raped to the hospital. He's served numerous warrants to armed and dangerous individuals, recovered lots and lots of stolen cars, and yep, he's written hundreds, if not thousands, of traffic tickets and, of course, been told he should be out looking for real criminals as he hands the offender his citation. And still he puts on his vest with a smile as he heads out the door every morning. 

"He signed up for that."

You're damn right he did. Every time he goes to work, he willingly protects and serves the citizens of his community to the best of his ability and training. But nowhere in the manual does it say he should die while protecting and serving. In fact, he's been trained to do just the opposite. Anyone who wants to Monday morning quarterback decisions he makes to keep his brothers and sisters in blue, as well as himself, alive needs to know that most agencies are hiring; by all means, put your application in.

He despises dirty cops and the black mark they put on his profession and the distrust they create in his community. Yet, because of the uniform, he is still lumped in with them when "fuck the police" is chanted by angry mobs.

I'm not even going to speak about prejudice, and he's been accused, other than the idea that he would target someone because of race, religion, or creed rather than behavior is offensive, to say the least.

So I am struggling with all that's being said on the Ferguson issue. I don't know that community, I don't know Michael Brown or Officer Wilson. But I do know Officer Wilson's wife - but for the grace of God, I am her.

Brown dog, brown dog, what do you see?

We have a temporary visitor at our house.  I'm just calling him Brown Dog, although KC, Middle Kid and Dear Daughter have all named him (different names, I might add.)

A few weeks ago, I received a frantic phone call from a lady who had adopted one of my fosters; she had found a dog in a parking lot at the movie theater.  When she stopped to pick him up, a homeless couple came out of the shadows and said he'd been following them for days and handed her a leash and canned food (gee, that would explain why he'd been following them - more on that later.)  Not being able to keep him and not wanting him to go to Animal Control, she did the only thing she could think of, she called me.  I should mention at this point that I have agreed to help dogs in need in ways other than fostering.  We had started fostering again last fall and by January, I had failed AGAIN so I SWORE that I would take no more.  But in my defense, the new boy, Baxter, had been returned twice and can be a bit of a jerk but we think he's the cat's pajamas and the thought of him being returned a third time was more than any of us could bear.  He's actually KC's "2nd favorite, behind Frank."  Still, I was somewhat panicked at the thought of how KC was going to react when he came home to this little guy.  I should also mention Brown Dog is freaking adorable.  I greeted my husband at the door with, "It's only temporary - I promise!  There just needs to be a few adoptions so a space will open up for him at another foster's."  That was 10 days ago.  Since he's getting neutered tomorrow, I said we would keep him until he recovered.

Brown Dog adores Middle Kid, sleeps with him and charges at him full-speed when he gets home from work.  And because I raised Middle Kid right, he loves him back.  Still, I refuse to call the pup anything other than Brown Dog, despite the many names my family has christened him with (Hobo, Rufus, and Scooby.)  My girlfriend has taken to calling him Charlie, as in Charlie Brown (Dog), which is quite clever.  Baxter shadows him like he's going to steal the silver but the other dogs have accepted him as part of the pack and he fits in well, except at feeding time.  As I mentioned earlier, the homeless couple was feeding him canned food.  I have 6 permanent dogs, I do not have the money (or time) for canned food.  Still, my dogs act like they've won the lottery twice a day by howling and dancing when their bowls are being picked up to be filled with plain ol' dry food.  Brown Dog didn't buy the hype and would not even eat for the first day but realized by Day 2 at our house, that was the best he was getting.  He would, however, follow me until all the bowls were distributed, just to make sure I wasn't holding out on him.  I thought we had finally come to an understanding after he had been eating for a week straight but unfortunately, I was wrong,  The other morning, he followed me to the end of all the bowls being put down, took three bites of his food, then walked over to my curtain and peed - while looking right at me - as if to tell me how upset he was that CANNED FOOD IS FROWNED UPON IN THIS ESTABLISHMENT!  (That is an ETrade commercial reference, for those of you who are scratching your heads.)

Brown Dog is getting neutered tomorrow and I'm somewhat worried how he's going to express his displeasure with me about that.  I'm also a tiny bit worried how Middle Kid is going to handle it when he leaves.  I'm surprisingly okay at the thought of him going.  I'm comforted by the thought that he'll end up someplace where they will feed him canned food and give him a proper name.

Maybe not naming them is the key?  

Wet blankets on ice water challenges

Today on social media, I read two different negative articles about the Ice Water Challenges that seem to have taken America by storm and I have to tell you, I’m annoyed.  Only in America would people bitch about something that is supposed to be a good thing that supports others.  Whether it be about the delivery, people’s intentions, or God knows what else, people are complaining about it.  That seems to be the American way.  Forget the good that it’s doing – let’s find something to kvetch about from my comfy couch while I do absolutely nothing to contribute to the greater good.  Or better yet, my contribution to the greater good is better than yours, so I can be judgmental and criticize it.

One of the chief complaints is that people are not drawing enough attention to the cause they are supporting.  My response to that is – how are they hurting the cause?  Does it really matter that John is only doing the challenge so he can be shirtless on camera and show off his abs, or Tiffany just wants to look noble in front of her country club friends and neither are educating me on what the cause is about?  I couldn’t give a rat’s ass less.  They’re publicly saying, “this organization is worthy of my help” and that’s enough for me.  Then there’s the domino effect.  These two do the challenge – then challenge their friends, let’s say four total, then those four each challenge four, then those sixteen each challenge four…. Well, you get the idea.  Much like an unaltered cat will multiply (please, spay and neuter!), so did this challenge and the good it’s doing.  And frankly, it kind of did my soul good to see so many people get behind something positive for a change.  Who am I to judge if they have ulterior motives?  I don’t care about Mr. and Mrs. Smith’s intentions when they show up to a charity fundraiser.  If they’re there to hobknob, promote a “good side” to the press, show constituents they care about the people, impress their boss, win over their daughter’s future in-laws, or meet another couple they can swing with – I DON’T CARE.  They showed up, they donated money, and they legitimized the cause.

Another grievance is that so many people are opting to do the challenge and not donate.  Okay, here are my two issues with that.  1) OF COURSE they’re doing the challenge – otherwise you probably wouldn’t know about it and 2) every video I have seen, the people are saying they are donating some amount to some cause – although ALS research seems to be the celebrity beneficiary, two of the charities that are dear to my heart (LEWC and SaveThePetsAZ) have been local recipients.  How is this a bad thing?  “Well, how many are REALLY donating what they say they will?”  I don’t know – and again, I DON’T CARE.  I’m betting on the fact that they made a video for the world to see – including the charity they are supporting – and said they are going to donate will be motivation enough for them to follow through.  But, as in life, there are going to be people who don’t keep their word.  Hopefully the people they called out will at least keep theirs and hence, they still helped in some small way.  In animal rescue, we know people back out all the time from commitments they make (agreeing to foster, pledging money to help with vet care, donating food, etc.) but the MAJORITY come through.  I’ll take 10 people publicly saying they’re going to do something and only have eight come through than four people privately saying it and following through ANY day.  That’s what this challenge is – a numbers game.  By calling out 1,000 people who may have never contributed and even getting only a 75% return, that’s still 75% more than there was.  And even if they can't afford to donate, this provides a way for them to show support; where's the harm in that?

And finally, the water wasting…. Unless you’ve never played in the hose, let your shower run to “get warm,” taken a bath, swam in a pool, rewashed the clothes in the washer because you forgot about them, let the water run while brushing your teeth, or emptied your cooler full of water and ice after your trip to the beach is over, you really need to shut the hell up about this one.  

In short, I’m in a bit of a tizzy about this because people are taking something positive and actively looking to find something negative about it when there is ZERO gain to be had in finding something bad and so much to be reaped in finding the good.